fix algining xynova texture to uv printing fixture.

sensors/finger-xynova/r01/design.yaml

@@ -78,6 +78,22 @@ texture_patch:
 texture_patch_views:
   enabled: true
   pattern_camera: cam_sensor     # the pattern every layout carries, same source as `compute`
+  # Per-view page sizing. Measured here: the uv_1/uv_2 layouts are 21.1989 x 23.2003 mm
+  # (aspect 0.9137) and 21.2001 x 23.2003 mm (aspect 0.9138) — PORTRAIT. `vector:` above says
+  # 18.5 x 16.4 (aspect 1.1280), which is LANDSCAPE, so the artwork was stretched 23% in the
+  # wrong direction. `auto` derives the page per view and proves the layout really is a
+  # bounds-projection from the named camera before using the result.
+  #
+  # `px_per_mm: 200` reproduces the existing density exactly (3700/18.5 = 200.0).
+  #
+  # `fixed` keeps `texture_patch.vector`, which unwrapped layouts (`produce`, `compute`)
+  # require — they are not projections.
+  #
+  # Overlay note: the scene render is 250x250 while these layouts are 0.9138 aspect, so set the
+  # render resolution to the emitted raster size and use "Stretch to fill".
+  page:
+    mode: auto
+    px_per_mm: 200
   pairs:
     - id: uv_1
       camera: cam_uv_1           # REGION camera
@@ -87,10 +103,18 @@ texture_patch_views:
       uv_map: uv_2
   merge:
     mode: authored               # honour the 45-edge seam marked on the mesh
-    incidence_limit_deg: 62.0    # measured on this part: hole fraction 0.0002 at 62 deg
+    # RE-MEASURED 2026-09-29 after the region cameras moved (cam_uv_1 az 318.9 -> 308.3,
+    # elevation -43.3 -> -24.5, distance 37.6 -> 32.6 mm). Sweep at min_triangle_coverage 0.60:
+    #   62deg -> hole 0.0480  FAILS max_hole_fraction (a visible bald patch of 29.6 mm^2)
+    #   65deg -> hole 0.0130  passes, but barely
+    #   70deg -> hole 0.0001  passes with margin  <-- current
+    # The limit is a property of the camera poses and the surface, so MOVING THE CAMERAS
+    # INVALIDATES IT. Re-run the sweep after any re-pose. min_triangle_coverage is not binding
+    # here: relaxing it to 0 changes nothing at 62 or 70 degrees.
+    incidence_limit_deg: 70.0
     min_footprint_mm2: 2.0e-3
     min_triangle_coverage: 0.60
-    max_hole_fraction: 0.02
+    max_hole_fraction: 0.02      # enforced: the run fails above this rather than shipping a gap
     component_policy: best_coverage
   seam:
     boundary: use_seam